Dr. Natalia Basile is a senior embryologist at IVI Madrid.She graduated as a biochemist in 1999 from JFK University in Buenos Aires, Argentina. After graduating she went on to pursue her IVF laboratory training in United States. She temporarily joined RMA of New Jersey to then participate in the start up of RMA of New York, where she became Laboratory Supervisor for several years. During her years in United States Dr. Basile obtained her Master’s Degree in Clinical Embryology and Andrology at the Eastern Virginia Medical School and the Jones Institute for Reproductive Medicine. In 2008, she moved to Spain, where she joined IVI RMA Madrid. Since then she´s been actively working in the clinical IVF and research. Dr. Basile obtained her PhD from Universidad Rey Juan Carlos in Madrid where she focused on embryo development and morphokinetics.
Dr. Basile is an ESHRE certified member since 2008. She has been invited to speak nationally and internationally and has authored several peer reviewed abstracts, publications and book chapters. She has been involved in teaching classes in Master’s Degree Programs at Universidad Rey Juan Carlos and European University in Madrid.
Frozen embryo transfer after PGT-A cycles: To wait or not to wait?
Cerillo M Cruz m Basile N Guillen A Bronet F García-Velasco A
Medicina Reproductiva y Embriología ClínicaIn press, corrected proofAvailable online 5 November 2020
A Strength, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats analysis on time lapse.
Basile N Elkhatib I Meseguer M
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Mar 28. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000534. [Epub ahead of print]
Type of chromosome abnormality affects embryo morphology dynamics.
Del Carmen Nogales M Bronet F Basile N Martínez EM Liñán A Rodrigo L Meseguer M
Fertil Steril, 107(1):229-235, 2017.
Automatic time-lapse instrument is superior to single-point morphology observation for selecting viable embryos: retrospective study in oocyte donation.
Aparicio-Ruiz B Basile N Basile N Pérez Albalá S Bronet F Remohí J Meseguer M
Fertil Steril, 106:1379-85, 2016.
How much have we learned from time-lapse in clinical IVF?
Castelló D Motato Y Basile N Remohí J Espejo-Catena M Meseguer M
Mol Hum Reprod, 22(10):719-727, 2016
The state of "freeze-for-all" in human ARTs.
Basile N García-Velasco JA
J Assist Reprod Genet, 33(12):1543-1550, 2016
The use of morphokinetics as a predictor of implantation: a multicentric study to define and validate an algorithm for embryo selection.
Basile N Vime P Florensa M Aparicio-Ruiz B García-Velasco JA Remohí J Meseguer M
Hum Reprod, 30(2):276-83, 2015.
Time-Lapse in the IVL lab: how should we assess potential benefit
Basile N Barrière P Meseguer M Fréour T
Hum Reprod, 30(5):1276, 2015
Systematic review on clinical outcomes following selection of human preimplantation embryos with time-lapse monitoring.
Freour T Basile N Barriere P Meseguer M
Hum Reprod Update, 21(1):153-4, 2015
What does morphokinetics add to embryo selection and in-vitro fertilization?
Basile N Caiazzo M Meseguer M
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol, 27(3):193-200, 2015.
Time-lapse in the IVF lab: how should we assess potential benefit?
Basile N Barriere P Meseguer M Freour T
Hum Reprod, 30:1276-1276, 2015.
What does morphokinetics add to embryo selection and in-vitro fertilization outcomes?
Basile N Caiazzo M Meseguer M
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol, 27:193-200, 2015.
The use of morphokinetics as a predictor of ?implantation: a multicentric study to define and validate an algorithm for embryo selection.
Basile N Vime P Florensa M Aparicio Ruiz B García-Velasco JA Remohí J Meseguer M
Human Reprod, 30(2);276-83, 2015.
Increasing the probability of selecting chromosomally normal embryos by time-lapse morphokinetics analysis.
Basile N Nogales MC Bronet F Florensa M Riqueiros M Rodrigo L García-Velasco JA Meseguer M
Fertil Steril, 101:699-704, 2014.
Increasing the probability of selecting chromosomally normal embryos by time-lapse morphokinetic analysis.
Basile N Bronet F Nogales MC Martínez E Ariza M Agudo Garcillán D Florensa M Riqueros M Meseguer M
Fertil Steril 101(3):699-704, 2014.
Type of culture media does not affect embryo kinetics: a time-lapse analysis of sibling oocytes.
Basile N Morbeck D García-Velasco JA Bronet F Meseguer M
Hum Reprod,28(3):634-41, 2013
Embryo incubation and selection in a time-lapse monitoring system improves pregnancy outcome compared with a standard incubator: a retrospective cohort study.
Meseguer M Rubio I Cruz M Basile N Marcos J Requena A
Fertil Steril, 98(6):1481-9, 2012.
Evaluation of embryo quality: Time-lapse imaging to assess embryo morphokinesis.
Basile N García Velasco J Meseguer M
Textbook of Assisted Reproductive Techniques. David Gardner, Ariel Weissman, Colin Howles, and Zeev Shoham Chapter 19.
Time-lapse technology: evaluation of embryo quality and new markers for embryo selection.
Basile N Meseguer M
Expert Rev Obstet Gynecol, 7:175-190, 2012.
- Alegre L Del Gallego R Bori L Basile N Loewke K Mahnaz M Aparicio Ruiz B Palma Govea A Marcos J Meseguer M P-164: Assessment of embryo implantation potential with a cloud-based automatic software. Presented at the 74th Scientific Congress & Expo of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, Denver, CO, USA, 23-26 June 2019
- Aparicio Ruiz B Basile N Alegre L Viloria T Remohi J Meseguer M Comparison of embryo quality and euploidy rate using two different timelapse systems and a benchtop incubator in the same ivf laboratory. Presented at the 73rd annual meeting of the American Society of Reproductive Medicine, San Antonio, Texas, October 6-10, 2018
- Basile N Aparicio Ruiz B Alegre L Bosch E Pellicer A Meseguer M Laboratory strategies: canweachieve the same results doing pseudo undisturbed culture in a conventional incubator vs real undisturbed culture in 3 different time-lapse systems?. Presented at the 73rd annual meeting of the American Society of Reproductive Medicine, San Antonio, Texas, October 6-10, 2018
- Basile N Insua MF Cobo A Tejera A Pellicer A Meseguer M The difference in delivery rates and number of neonates between time-lapse systems and standard incubators changes depending on the number and the stage of the embryos being transferred. Presented at the 33rd annual meeting of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology, Geneva,Switerland, October 28-November 1,2017
- Zaninovic N Zhan Q Rosenwaks Z Basile N Pellicer A Meseguer M Comparison of morphokinetic markers which predict blastocyst formation and implantation potential from two large clinical datasets; CRM, WCM, U.S.A. and IVI, Spain. , , July 2-5 ,2017